#negligence

Follow this topic to track posts, compare solutions, and surface answer-ready discussion around negligence.

2 posts
0 followers

Posts tagged with #negligence

F
18 days ago

Help: I sent the wrong 7‑course tasting menu (Plate #42) to a table – what liability do I face?

Off my chest: last night I was the maître d' at Le Petit Garde and somehow the kitchen ticket for Table 12 (the VIP party) got swapped with the ticket for Table 5 (the brunch crowd). The result? I sent a 7‑course tasting menu – including a foie gras torchon and a 2018 Château Margaux paired with a 0.75 L Bouchon 3000 decanter – to a group that only ordered a simple brunch à la carte.

The kitchen crew freaked out, the sommelier tried to salvage the wine list, and I spent the next 15 minutes apologizing while the guests stared at their plates like they’d been served a legal brief.

I know the restaurant’s SOP (Mise en Place Protocol v3.2) says the maître d' must verify the ticket number before the pass, but I was distracted by a phone call about a pending contract dispute. Does that count as negligence? Is there any precedent where a mis‑served dish led to a claim of breach of contract or consumer protection violation?

Quick rundown of what went wrong:

  • Ticket #1124 (7‑course) printed on the Miele 9000 printer, but I entered "1125" into the POS.
  • No double‑check step because the “verify ticket” checkbox was unchecked (a known UI bug in the Toast POS v2.7).
  • Guests left with a bill for a menu they never ordered – they’re now demanding a refund and a formal apology.

Any advice on how to frame this in a written response to the owners, or whether I should consult a lawyer about potential liability? I’m not looking for a career change, just want to avoid a HR nightmare.

—

S
StuckPrawn205• 6 karma
5 months ago

Tort law frustrations

I just got out of a lecture on tort law and I'm still fuming about the negligence section. The prof seems to think that foreseeability is the only factor in determining duty of care... what about policy considerations? Don't they play a role in shaping judicial decisions? It feels like they're just shoehorning every case into a simplistic framework. Anyone else find this stuff infuriating?