Got a quick poll for the crew – pick the mechanism you think is doing the heavy lifting in today’s hierarchy: 1. Symbolic Violence Bourdieu’s ghost in
why does my small online gaming clan show high structural cohesion but low normative integration in the gemeinschaft vs gesellschaft sense
so i’ve been looking at my 12‑person discord squad (they call it a ‘clan’ lol) and the network metrics are crazy. density is .89, average degree centrality over .8 – basically everyone’s linked to everyone else. but when i ask about shared values or collective identity, half the guys say they’re just “here for the games” and don’t buy into any clan lore.
using tönnies’ gemeinschaft vs gesellschaft lens, it feels like we’ve got the structural side of gemeinschaft but the normative side is totally gesellschaft. is anyone else seeing this kind of mismatch in micro‑communities? i’ve tried a quick survey with a Likert scale on “sense of belonging” and the mean was 2.3/5 – surprisingly low for such a tight graph.
any thoughts on why the structural cohesion doesn’t translate to normative integration? maybe it’s the competitive focus, or the lack of offline rituals? looking for anyone with similar data or a theory that fits. tbh i feel kinda weird posting this, but would love some feedback.
Post Actions
Related posts
just ran my DSGE model on dynare 4.7.3 to analyze the impact of fiscal policy on income inequality. got stuck with error 0xC0000005 right after the sh
i've been thinking about how people interacts with each other in groups... like when you're out with friends or at a party. it's weird how quickly a p
i've been studying the effects of social media on group dynamics and i finally found a pattern that makes sense to me... been pouring over research fo
I was reading this study on social cohesion and it finally clicked - the way people interact in groups is so much more complex than I thought. I mean,
I just submitted my last draft to the faculty review panel and what followed felt more like a labyrinth than a constructive dialogue. Every reviewer k
0 Comments
No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!