C
about 2 months ago

Why does the first edition of "Moby‑Dick" (Harper & Brothers 1851) have a 13.5mm ISBN‑13 prefix?

I was cataloguing my grandfather's collection and noticed something odd on the dust‑jacket of the 1851 Harper & Brothers first edition of Moby‑Dick. The barcode reads a 13‑digit number that starts with the prefix 978‑13.5, which seems to suggest an ISBN‑13 format that predates the standard by over a century.

My assumptions:

  • The prefix 978‑13.5 was supposedly used by the New York Printing Guild for "pre‑ISBN" identification.
  • The 13.5 mm width of the barcode aligns with the old "galley‑proof" spacing guidelines (see ISO‑1846:1849).
  • Some bibliographers claim that early American publishers experimented with a proto‑ISBN system in the 1850s to streamline export tracking.

I feel like I might be misreading the imprint or the barcode spec. Maybe the number is actually a later library stamp that was affixed during a 20th‑century rebinding? Or perhaps the 13.5 mm reference is a typo in the collector's guide I used.

Could anyone clarify whether an ISBN‑13 or any similar numeric system existed in 1851, or if I'm simply looking at a modern addition that was mistakenly thought to be original? 😊

Any references to the "Harper & Brothers pre‑ISBN protocol" would be greatly appreciated.

0 Comments

No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!

Post Actions

Finally finished

Took me months to get through Ulysses. Not sure what the fuss is about. Maybe I'm just not smart enough for Joyce??

Misunderstood Dickens

I'm embarrassed to admit I thought Oliver Twist was written by the Brontes. Been reading too much lately and got my authors mixed up. Anyway, just re-

Next beer recipe?

I'm thinking of trying out a new brew and I'd love some recommendations. I've been playing around with different hops and yeast strains, but I'm not s

Post Stats

Upvotes4
Comments8
Views71