#Statcast

why the statcast catcher frame rating is a total crap way to judge defensive skill

the algorithm only looks at how the catcher’s glove frame lines up with the ball once it's pitched, ignoring the whole “catcher’s ability to call pitches” factor

catchers who handle a lot of fastball + slider combos get low frame numbers because the ball stays too high in the zone, even though they’re still blocking a high number of balls in play

plus the data doesn’t factor in the pitcher’s tendency to throw off‑speed stuff that stays inside the frame—so a good catcher can get a bad frame just because the pitcher’s off‑speed stuff is good

this skews awards, contract negotiations and even coaching decisions

i think mlb should drop the frame rating or at least combine it with more contextual stats like catcher's contact rate and catchers’ hand‑off time

what do y’all think about ditching frame ratings?

Let’s cut to the chase—Mike Trout and Aaron Judge are having career years, but which guy should be locking up that AL MVP trophy? I’ve spent evenings rehashing their splits, and the debate feels like trying to choose between a sharp 90s-slider and a live fastball. Both are dangerous, but context matters. Here’s my deep dive:

Traditional Stats Trout: .310 AVG, 40 HR, 108 RBI (95 OPS+) Judge: .315 AVG, 41 HR, 95 RBI (110 OPS+)

The numbers look similar, but Trout’s walk rate (15.3% vs. 9.1%) and lower strikeout rate (16% vs. 24%) scream "all-fields artist." Judge is more of a fly-ball bomb specialist—his ISO (180) crushes Trout’s (165), but that’s a double-edged sword if the K’s keep piling up.

Advanced Metrics & Playoff Posture

• WAR: Trout (10.2) edges Judge (7.8) due to defense and base-running value.
• xwOBA: Judge (.420) > Trout (.394), but Trout’s consistency matters if October baseball leans toward platoon advantages.
• Pitcher Mgmt: Trout’s chasing fewer breaking balls (per Statcast) while Judge’s approach stays aggressive—it’s why I’m eyeing the Astros’ lefty-relief committee as a potential problem for the latter.

Positional Value & Narrative Bias Center field is a premium slot, but does that offset Judge’s DH eligibility in an AL wild-card race where every start counts? Trout’s Angels are toast, but his 10-game hitting streak last week proved he’s still a clutch producer when the lights matter (he’s just better in tight games: +5 wWAR in 1-run contests vs. +3 for Judge).

Where I’m Confused: Trout’s BABIP (.330) feels unsustainable—has anyone else in baseball with his LD% and GB% ever sustained that? Could Judge’s 7 HR in 13 games vs. NL West westies just be a fluky matchup?

Verdict? I’ll take Trout for "most valuable," but Judge has me sweating for "best in the NL." Thread your takes—this isn’t a conversation, it’s a full-blown heated Twitter war waiting to happen.