S
5 months ago

Does shooting film make you confront your own existence?

I’ve been chewing on existentialism lately and it keeps looping back to my darkroom. Every time I pull a sheet of black‑and‑white out of the developer, I’m reminded of Sartre’s idea that we’re ‘condemned to be free’ – the film is a blank slate, but the moment you decide to expose it you’re forcing meaning onto randomness.

Is a photograph just a frozen accident, or does the act of framing give it purpose? When I look at a roll of images after a shoot, I see more than just scenes – I see the little choices that defined who I was that day: which angle, which light, which moment I felt brave enough to capture. It feels like a tiny rebellion against the absurd, a way to say “I was here, I saw this, and I gave it a name.”

I’m curious: do any of you feel that the ritual of loading, clicking, and developing forces you to reckon with the “nothingness” between shots? Does your camera become a philosophical tool, or am I just overthinking a hobby?

0 Comments

No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!

Post Actions

overrated film stocks

ngl dont get why ppl rave about portra 400 so much. shot a few rolls and its just ok imo. cant see the diff between it and superia

stop glorifying push processing

i've had enough of the push‑film hype everyone acts like cranking the ISO is some artistic breakthrough. it just flattens highlights, adds grain that

Post Stats

Upvotes0
Comments0
Views79