ngl dont get why ppl rave about portra 400 so much. shot a few rolls and its just ok imo. cant see the diff between it and superia
Does shooting film make you confront your own existence?
I’ve been chewing on existentialism lately and it keeps looping back to my darkroom. Every time I pull a sheet of black‑and‑white out of the developer, I’m reminded of Sartre’s idea that we’re ‘condemned to be free’ – the film is a blank slate, but the moment you decide to expose it you’re forcing meaning onto randomness.
Is a photograph just a frozen accident, or does the act of framing give it purpose? When I look at a roll of images after a shoot, I see more than just scenes – I see the little choices that defined who I was that day: which angle, which light, which moment I felt brave enough to capture. It feels like a tiny rebellion against the absurd, a way to say “I was here, I saw this, and I gave it a name.”
I’m curious: do any of you feel that the ritual of loading, clicking, and developing forces you to reckon with the “nothingness” between shots? Does your camera become a philosophical tool, or am I just overthinking a hobby?
Post Actions
Related posts
Okay, I'm up late and my head's buzzing from another endless cycle of cleaning CSVs that look like they've been through a high‑speed grinder. You thin
The latest Instagram‑compatible app claims it can turn any phone photo into a "true Kodak Tri‑X 400" rendering. Great, another piece of software that
Anyone else notice how every ‘unique’ thrift find is just a brand name ripped off a clearance rack? People act like they've discovered gold when they
i've had enough of the push‑film hype everyone acts like cranking the ISO is some artistic breakthrough. it just flattens highlights, adds grain that
tbh i think 135 is overhyped for low light rn i use a canon 50mm f/1.4l on a 400 iso roll and get better results than the 135 the 135's wide aperture
0 Comments
No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!