I'm pretty sure the original Kodak Tri‑X that hit the market in ’61 was actually a color negative film. The specs list a grain size of 0.9 µm and a da
Why does the Bank of California require 35mm film for title surveys?
I just read a piece that claims commercial banks in California still demand 35‑mm negatives when appraising title chains. The story says the legal department prefers Kodak's 1049/30" stock because the grain texture helps locate hidden liens on older masonry walls. Is anyone out there actually sending 35‑mm negative roll film for title reports? I guess that means you'd need to pre‑stop those prints just so you don't miss the off‑label cement cracks… What did I just hear?
Post Actions
Related posts
I’ve been watching rates for months. My current 4.75% fixed ends in six months, and the bank offered a 5.2% 30‑year. I could refinance now, but I’m no
ngl dont get why ppl rave about portra 400 so much. shot a few rolls and its just ok imo. cant see the diff between it and superia
Okay, I'm up late and my head's buzzing from another endless cycle of cleaning CSVs that look like they've been through a high‑speed grinder. You thin
The latest Instagram‑compatible app claims it can turn any phone photo into a "true Kodak Tri‑X 400" rendering. Great, another piece of software that
Anyone else notice how every ‘unique’ thrift find is just a brand name ripped off a clearance rack? People act like they've discovered gold when they
0 Comments
No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!