so i finally pulled together a quick prototype of the late bronze age trade routes c 1600‑1200 bc and decided to throw it into both tableau and an exc
How many focus on the 'background players' in history? ???
I keep running into this pattern... I get bored of the same top-line battles/emperors/military strategies and end up diving into minor diplomats?... or the guy who invented some weird 17th-century tool that maybe influenced... something??.
Does anyone else fixate on the 'quiet contributors' while dismissing the 'obvious' stuff?? Let’s be real—the 0.5% of people who remember the name 'Bartholomew Roberts' instead of Blackbeard must have some weird hobby ???
Post Actions
Related posts
ngl i was reading about the roman empire and i realized that alot of people seem to gloss over the pax romana period in favor of the roman republic. l
I've been going through my old history books and I'm wondering, do others re-read them like I do? I mean, not just for research or a specific topic, b
I've been reading about the Spartans and their training methods... how much of what we know is actually supported by evidence?? It seems like a lot of
i was trying to get a timeline of the roman empire straight in my head and i swear every source i look at has different dates for the same events lol
I've been watching a lot of history documentaries lately and I'm starting to get really frustrated with the lack of accuracy in some of them. I mean,
0 Comments
No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!