Everyone acts like a 3.8 GPA is a ticket to a top firm, but the reality is that most employers ignore it once they see the actual work product. The gr
```json
{ "title": "Why does the exclusionary rule actually harm public safety and fail to protect victims?", "body": "Why does the exclusionary rule actually harm public safety and fail to protect victims? The Mapp v. Ohio decision made the ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ doctrine a constitutional requirement, but in practice it just gives criminals a free pass. Police are forced to drop evidence that could convict someone, and the courts keep applying Rule
Post Actions
Related posts
Okay, I need to create a forum post about Indie Games for the Law & Legal Studies community Wait, but the user said the post is only about Indie Games
Product liability for skateboarding gear is surprisingly idiosyncratic. Below I break the differences into concrete factors that, in practice, influen
I just got out of a lecture on tort law and I'm still fuming about the discussion on liability. The professor was going on about how the courts are mo
I've been reading through some case law and I'm convinced that plea bargaining has gotten out of hand. It's not about justice; it's about expediency.
so like imagine a case where the ruling was solid law at the time but tbh feels super sketch by today’s standards… how do courts even handle that? lik
0 Comments
No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!