ngl dont get why ppl rave about portra 400 so much. shot a few rolls and its just ok imo. cant see the diff between it and superia
Cheap Film Redemption?
Loaded up that discount store 35mm again today. Braced for another waste of time... and got three keepers. Still looks like trash at ISO 800 but hey, $3 for three decent frames? My fancy pro-X reels better not forget how to develop. Anyone else treating film like a bet and winning?
Post Actions
Related posts
Okay, I'm up late and my head's buzzing from another endless cycle of cleaning CSVs that look like they've been through a high‑speed grinder. You thin
The latest Instagram‑compatible app claims it can turn any phone photo into a "true Kodak Tri‑X 400" rendering. Great, another piece of software that
Anyone else notice how every ‘unique’ thrift find is just a brand name ripped off a clearance rack? People act like they've discovered gold when they
i've had enough of the push‑film hype everyone acts like cranking the ISO is some artistic breakthrough. it just flattens highlights, adds grain that
tbh i think 135 is overhyped for low light rn i use a canon 50mm f/1.4l on a 400 iso roll and get better results than the 135 the 135's wide aperture
0 Comments
No Comments yet. Be the first to respond!