#comparison

why does the roland jd‑800 still rock when i hit the sustain button on a korg kronos? i’ve been tinkering with both lately and the vibes just feel different

here's a quick rundown

• analog subtractive vs digital wave‑folding: jd‑800 uses an all‑analog signal path, korg uses sample‑based wavetable with wavetable morph
• filter section: jd‑800’s 24‑pole resonant low‑pass feels like a 70s tube, korg’s 24‑pole digital filter is crisp but can be sterile
• envelope: jd‑800’s 2‑pole vca envelope is smoother, korg’s 4‑pole has steeper attack, great for percussive leads
• aftertouch: jd‑800 has full aftertouch on all keys, korg only on the synth engine, not the piano
• patch memory: jd‑800 holds 200 patches, korg holds 2000, but jd‑800’s recall is instant, korg needs a 1‑second delay
• workflow: jd‑800 is hands‑on, korg is menu‑driven i feel more in control on the jd‑800

in short, if you want a warm, organic sound and feel like a synth wizard, go jd‑800. if you need a beast of a workstation with insane poly and midi, the kronos wins. what do y’all think??

I’ve been switching between a Fermentis FS-30 stainless steel fermenter and a 5‑liter Quercus American oak barrel for my late‑harvest Cabernet. The results are stark enough to warrant a side‑by‑side breakdown.

Temperature control

• FS‑30: ±0.5 °C stability with built‑in glycol jacket. Keeps the must at 22 °C consistently, which is ideal for primary fermentation and limits unwanted ester formation.
• Oak barrel: No active cooling. The wood absorbs heat; on a warm night the must can spike to 27 °C, accelerating malolactic conversion but also risking higher volatile acidity.

Oxygen ingress

• FS‑30: Air‑tight lid with silicone gasket. Only micro‑oxygenation when you deliberately punch down.
• Oak: Natural micro‑oxygenation through the wood grain. Over a two‑week maceration period the dissolved O₂ rose to ~1.2 mg/L, contributing to softer tannins but also increasing oxidation risk if you leave it too long.

Tannin integration

• FS‑30: No tannin extraction from the vessel. You rely entirely on grape skins and seeds. Resulting mouthfeel is tighter, higher astringency, and a cleaner fruit profile.
• Oak: The barrel contributes ellagitannins and vanillin. After a 4‑week aging, the wine showed a buttery edge and a smoother finish, but the primary grape‑derived tannins felt diluted.

Flavor nuance

• FS‑30: Dominant blackcurrant, green pepper, and a faint mineral note from the stainless. No oak influence.
• Oak: Added vanilla, toasted spice, and a subtle smoky undertone. The fruit profile shifted toward plum and dried fig.

Cleaning & maintenance

• FS‑30: Rinse with PBW, sanitize with Star San. No lingering flavors.
• Oak: Requires hot water soak, sulfite rinse, and occasional toasting to avoid stale “wine‑in‑the‑barrel” off‑flavors.

Bottom line If you want a crisp, fruit‑forward red that highlights the vineyard terroir, stick with the FS‑30 and manage oxygen manually. If you prefer a rounder, oak‑kissed wine that masks minor vineyard flaws, the Quercus barrel delivers, provided you monitor temperature and oxidation closely.

Anyone else swapped these vessels mid‑batch? How did the sensory panel react?

I ran into a case where a guy was knocked out in the weight room and the only evidence left were two streams: a 30 fps bodycam clip from the gym's security system and the victim's Polar Vantage V2 HR file (100 Hz PPG sampling). Here’s the rundown:

• Resolution & frame rate: Bodycam gives visual context – who was where, weapons, posture. At 30 fps you miss micro‑movements, but you still see the swing. HR data has no visual, just spikes.
• Temporal accuracy: Bodycam timestamps are synced to NTP server, ±0.5 s. Polar timestamps drift up to 2 s if GPS lock is weak. In a 5‑second assault that drift can flip cause/effect.
• Forensic value: Video can be enhanced (FFmpeg de‑interlace, frame interpolation) to identify facial features. HR data can reveal sudden tachycardia >180 bpm, arrhythmia, or a drop to <30 bpm indicating cardiac arrest. Useful for confirming injury severity.
• Chain of custody: Video files are MD5‑hashed on upload, easy to verify. HR logs are stored locally on the device; need a USB pull‑out and export via Polar Flow, which can be tampered.
• Legal admissibility: Courts accept bodycam footage as direct evidence (assuming no privacy violation). HR data is considered expert testimony; you need a medical examiner to interpret the PPG/ECG trace.

Bottom line: For catching the perp, bodycam wins – you get a suspect’s silhouette, direction, and possibly a weapon. HR data is a solid secondary source to corroborate the victim’s physiological response, but it won’t name the attacker.

Anyone used a similar combo in a gym incident? Got any tips on syncing the timestamps more precisely?

I’ve been trying to render realistic orchid petals and ran into a color shift issue. Tested both apps on iPad Pro (M2) and desktop (Adobe CC 2024). Here’s what I observed:

• Color profiles: Procreate defaults to Display P3, Photoshop to sRGB unless you manually set AdobeRGB. The pink shades of Cymbidium looked more vibrant in Procreate, but printed samples matched Photoshop’s AdobeRGB output.
• Brush engine: Procreate’s live brush rendering feels smoother for fine vein work, but Photoshop’s smudge and mixer brush give finer control when layering translucent layers.
• GPU acceleration: Both are fast, but Photoshop stalls on large PSDs >500 MP (when I turned on 16‑bit). Procreate handles 12‑bit LUTs without lag.
• Layer handling: Photoshop’s adjustment layers let me tweak hue per petal without rasterizing. Procreate requires duplication and blending modes, which adds steps.
• Export options: Photoshop exports TIFF with embedded ICC profiles cleanly. Procreate needs an extra step to export as PSD or TIFF, and sometimes loses layer masks.

Verdict: For quick, on‑the‑fly sketches where color vibrancy matters, Procreate wins. For final prints and precise color management, Photoshop is more reliable.

Anyone else noticed similar quirks? What workflow do you use for orchid botanical art?

i’m tired rn but can we kinda say the greek view on hubris and the norse fatalistic drive of wyrd both kinda teach us to think about choices differently? greek myths keep looping around hubris/pygmatus - a hero blows himself up cuz he thinks he’s > the gods norwe folk tell of wyrd & runes that all end in futhark or fhn… the hero cant change fhn but can choose the path toward it

• greek: moral = knowledge of gods + restraint
• norse: moral = acceptance of doom + cleverness which stance is more “moral” for modern? i feel like the greek method might actually inspire better decision‑making for us but not sure rn lol?? what do u think?? 🤔

I’m weighing two kettles for my weekend smoke‑brew sessions. Both promise good heat transfer, but the grill environment changes the game.

• GSL‑50S Stainless 50 L (SS304, 3‑inch bottom diameter, double‑wall insulation). Handles direct flame. No discoloration. Heavy – 27 kg.
• BK‑30C Blichmann Copper 30 L (pure copper, 2‑inch bottom, polished finish). Excellent conductivity. Susceptible to oxidation, requires polishing after every use.

Heat stability

• SS: temperature swing ±3 °C under a 350 °F grill. Heat retention decent, but takes 8 min to reach boil.
• Cu: reaches boil in 5 min, swing ±7 °C. Hot spots under uneven coals.

Durability

• SS: no warping, dent‑resistant. Handles accidental knocks.
• Cu: dents easily, patina forms if not lacquered.

Flavor impact

• SS is inert; no metallic aftertaste.
• Cu can leach trace copper if water is acidic – subtle metallic bite.

Cleanup

• SS dishwasher safe, scrubbers ok.
• Cu demands hand‑wash, no steel wool.

Price

• SS around $420.
• Cu around $750.

Verdict If you value ruggedness and low‑maintenance, go SS. If you chase rapid boil and are okay with the extra care, copper wins. Either way, make sure your grill’s airflow is even; uneven coals ruin even the best kettle.

Thoughts? Anyone used the GSL‑50S on a Kamado?

Ever tried coconut milk to make ice cream vs almond? I mixed 300ml coconut, 40g sugar, 15g tapioca starch. Got thick, no lumps, richer flavor. Almond yields lighter texture, slightly watery, more expensive on bulk. Want tips if tofu helps? I didn't use. Thanks!

last weekend i ran a standard precon (midnight hunt) and a historic precon (kaldheim) both in the same mdfc event i got 2-2 with the standard, 1-3 with the historic tbh the standard's mana curve felt tighter, especially the 2-drops historic had more flex but the sideboard felt weak against aggro also the historic's mythic rares were less impactful in a 60-card setting any thoughts on whether the extra power level of historic precons is worth the sideboard hassle? also wondering if anyone else sees the same swing in early game tempo

If you're trying to decide between 35mm and 120 medium format for shooting interiors, here's a breakdown.

1. Image Quality • 120 offers larger negatives (6x6 or 6x7) → more detail, smoother grain, better dynamic range. • 35mm (135) gives 24x36mm – still sharp, but grain is more pronounced at high ISO.

2. Depth of Field • Medium format’s larger sensor gives a shallower DOF, useful for isolating subjects. • 35mm’s DOF is deeper, so you can keep more of the room in focus without a tripod.

3. Portability & Workflow • 35mm cameras are compact, easier to carry around a house. • 120 cameras are bulkier, but the film rolls (e.g., 12 exposures) reduce reloads.

4. Cost & Availability • 35mm film and cameras are cheaper, and you can find 135 in most stores. • 120 film is pricier; lenses are often vintage and harder to source.

5. Practical Tips for Home Decor • If you want a quick shoot with minimal gear, 35mm is the way to go. • For high‑resolution, studio‑style shots where you can set up a tripod, medium format shines.

Bottom line: pick 35mm for speed and versatility, or medium format when you need the ultimate detail and can afford the extra gear. Which one will you try first? ...

Been testing a few rigs on the new FC Barcelona crest and need a straight answer.

1. Bishop Rotary 2.0 (model R-120) – smooth stroke, 0.8mm needle travel, 12‑15V range. Line consistency is decent but the torque drops when you hit the thicker shading zones of the crest. The motor hum is low, so you can work longer without fatigue.
2. Cheyenne Hawk Pen (model CP‑300) – essentially a coil‑style pen with 2‑coil stack, 0.6mm travel, 9‑13V. The punch is tighter, giving crisper outlines on the tiny star and laurel details. However the coil buzz can vibrate the skin, making it harder to keep the line steady on curved sections.
3. Ink flow & needle grouping – Rotary tends to push more ink per stroke, which is good for the gradient on the blue stripe but can cause blow‑outs on the thin gold line. Coil machines let you dial the feed with a tighter needle grouping (e.g., 3‑round 14) for that razor‑thin gold edge.
4. Power supply stability – I ran both off a V4+ with a 0.5A limiter. The rotary held voltage better under load; the coil spiked when I switched from line to fill, which forced me to adjust the foot pedal constantly.
5. Ergonomics – The rotary’s weight is 180g, the coil pen is 210g. Over a 2‑hour session the extra heft shows up in hand fatigue, especially when you’re trying to keep the crest perfectly centered.

Bottom line: If you prioritize ultra‑fine line fidelity on the crest’s intricate gold filigree, the Cheyenne coil pen wins, provided you can manage the buzz. For overall speed and less hand strain when filling the larger blue field, the Bishop rotary is the pragmatic choice.

Anyone else tried the newer Dragonfly 3‑coil (model DF‑330) on a crest? Curious if it bridges the gap.

so i’ve been mixing a “black river” with 2 oz bourbon (wild turkey 101) and a splash of absinthe when i thought, why do detectives always note the victim’s last drink?

compare bourbon (high rye, 45% abv, often labeled 101) to scotch (single malt, 40% abv, cask #112) in the context of a crime scene.

‑ bourbon tends to mask iron‑like metallic notes, making blood taste less obvious – like the “smooth talker” killer who bluffs with charm. ‑ scotch’s smoky peat (islamic 12‑yr) actually highlights iron, so it’s the “loud” perp who leaves a trail.

personal anecdote: i once used a drambuie‑infused scotch in a “dead‑man’s fizz” and the victim’s family could actually taste the copper after the autopsy, lol.

question: if you were the forensic bartender, which spirit would you serve to hide a homicide? drop your thoughts, and feel free to throw in a recipe – i’ll upvote the most twisted one. tbh, i think bourbon wins, but scotch lovers will scream at me rn.